Friday, November 23, 2007

The Case For English Only

In some California school districts, and in many other places around the country, there are attempts being made to make America a multiple language nation. The people pushing this agenda want school tests in Spanish, and workplaces that allow non-english speaking employees.

While that does sound like a good thing on the surface - tolerance is a good thing - anyone who scratches the surface will find that abandoning "English Only" would be a catastrophe for everyone.

Does anyone remember the story of the Tower of Babel, in Genesis? Apparently, liberals have not. In that story, the people had decided to work together to build a tower that would take them to the Heavens. God was unhappy about this, so he "confused their tongues", causing all the people to speak different languages so they could no longer work together. And so, the Tower of Babel was never built.

The moral of the story is obvious - if you want to keep people from working together for a common good, prevent them from speaking the same language.

People in America who only speak Spanish will be very limited in their opprtunities. They will be limited in the education they receive, and the careers available to them. They will always be "second-class" citizens.

For the good of all those Spanish-speaking people, and for the good of our entire country, it is imperative that we become a one-language nation. Only then do we have any chance of working together for the common good.

Encouraging a multi-language nation is a disaster waiting to happen. But it is even more insidious than that. The push for the acceptance of Spanish has intended, nasty consequences that are all but made invisible by the drivel being spouted by those who push this agenda. So allow me to be exceedingly clear:

Over the last 70 years - ever since FDR created the biggest welofare system this country had ever seen - the liberals have made it a point to be the ones to provide the lower income people with handouts (welfare) designed not to end poverty, but rather to make the poor more dependent upon liberals for their existence. And this results in the lower income people becoming a huge, pre-determined voting bloc for Democrats. The majority of lower income people, and all minorities, tend to vote Democrat. And they do this because the Democrats provide handouts. It is not unlike getting people addicted to drugs, so that the drug cartels can live in style, on the backs of those addicts. The addict cannot turn against those who provide his "fix". And the poor cannot afford to turn against democrats for the same reason. And if anyone thinks that is unintentional, then he just is not thinking at all. Either the democrats are smart enough to know the consequences, or they are too stupid to hold political office. So, if you think it is not a calculated plan, then you should not be voting for such stupid people. And if you do think this is calculated, then you should be afraid to vote for those people.

By sucking up to the Spanish-speaking people, the liberals understand that they are "buying" their votes for generations to come. And that is precisely why those SAME liberals are pushing to legalize all those Spanish-speaking people: the sooner they can get them and/or their offspring into the voting booths, the better it is for the liberals.

Liberals cannot win against conservatives in any open debate, because conservatives have facts, common sense and truth on their side. So the liberals do the only thing they can - they buy votes from those people living on the edge.

Make no mistake about it - and if you doubt this, look carefully through the history of the last 70 years. You will find that liberals have consistently and religiously been buying up large voting blocs by providing a "free ride" to those who, for whatever reason, do little on their own to support themselves. And democrats purposely keep those people on the edge - giving them just enough to keep them loyal, but not enough to better their lot in life.

It is in the best interests of the Democrats and liberals to keep the poor just as they are - poor. As such, they can keep their votes, by continuing to support them. The poor and minority groups are not stupid - they know that it is unwise to bite the hand that feeds you.

And now the illegal immigrants are the new "voting bloc" that the democrats are lining up. And if you are still around 30 years from now, remember this blog - remember it when you see that Latino bloc voting almost unanimously for democrats. Remember it when you notice that the same Latino bloc has, for the most part, been kept poor, just like the democratic "welfare system" has kept other minorities poor for 70 years.

No comments: