Vaccine Mandates and Jacobson v Massachusetts 1905

 

Covid "vaccines" are being mandated all over America. Opponents state such mandates are unconstitutional and violate human rights. Proponents claim that the Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled that states can force people to be vaccinated. But is that really true?

While it is true that the court in 1905 did stand on the side of forced vaccines in that particular case - a case where smallpox was rampant, very deadly and the only known method of ending the epidemic was vaccination that prevented and/or cured the disease.

The court found that there was sufficient evidence that the smallpox vaccine not only cured the disease and prevented infection, but was relatively safe with very rare instances of harm, and deaths from the vaccine were virtually absent.

However, that is not the case today with these Covid injections. There are serious issues with trying to apply the 1905 ruling today, and expect it to have it survive current facts:

• In 1905 there was a lot that was not known about vaccines. They were unaware of other medical issues a vaccine could cause as there were no studies that linked vaccinations to other possible medical conditions. As new studies come to light, it appears vaccines can do great harm to a person's health. 
• Deaths caused by the vaccine for smallpox were very rare.That is not the case with Covid injections which, by definition, are not even vaccines. VAERS proves that serious injury and even deaths caused by the Covid injection are anything but rare.We also know they adversely affect our immune system. And in the case of an RNA/DNA vaccine (which is the one being tested), it could change the entire human genome, and maybe not for the better.
  
• A COVID-19 vaccine is untested as far as long-term side effects, because the vaccine was rushed. NO ONE knows what the ultimate effect would be, or if it is truly "safe". Furthermore, it has yet to even be approved by the FDA
  
• In 1905, "tracking chips" and nanotechnology did not exist, and tracking nanoparticles - or any other control device - can now be injected into the body. If included in a vaccine, no matter the reason, a person has every right to reject it. And since there currently is no way to tell if it is or is not included, individuals have the right to reject any and all vaccines in the future.
• The 1905 decision also stated that a vaccine could only be mandated if there were no alternative therapies. Regardless of what many with ulterior motives claim, there are alternatives that are proven to be effective therapeutics, not the least of which is Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine with Z-pak, zinc, and vitamin C & D3. There is also monoclonal infusion of antibodies (plasma)
• Smallpox was extremely deadly, with few survivors. Covid-19 is no more deadly than any seasonal flu. Fewer than 36,000 deaths attributed to ONLY Covid-19 when there was no vaccine available, while the flu of 2018 killed between 35,000-60,000 in spite of having a vaccine available
  

The 1905 ruling stated "all persons not protected by vaccination should be vaccinated". The entire premise of the courts ruling was based on the vaccine preventing infection. In other words, there was an assumption the smallpox vaccine would prevent the disease. We know, however, that is not the case with Covid injections - even the makers state their injections will not prevent infection, nor prevent transmission. 

The court also stated that the smallpox vaccine had a "substantial relation to the protection of the public health and the public safety." Whereas the Covid injections do not substantially protect the public, as statistics indicate most of the new infection are among the vaccinated, and the vaccinated are literally spreading Covid, this injection should easily fail in the courts.

Even I, as a non-attorney, could present a case that would result in a ruling in favor of opponents to any Covid injection or medication. The simple fact that the Covid injections are not even designed to prevent infection, or prevent its transmission, coupled with the very high rate of adverse effects and deaths is, itself, enough to convince any honest, unbiased judge to rule in favor of opponents to forced vaccination. Add to that the very real possibility of "microchips" or tracking devices that are already available that could easily be included among the several toxic substances in every vaccine should seal their fate forever.

/

Never Catch Another Virus

This post will be reacted to much differently according to what a person's beliefs are. All I ask is that you realize one important fact:  beliefs are not facts. Please keep an open mind, and take some time to think critically.

Those of you who are better informed as to viruses will not be surprised by this. Most of you, however - including a lot of "expert virologists" still believe in the traditional thought on "germ theory".  At the end of this post is one of several videos that experts on virology have put together, and it explains a lot that, until now, has been unexplainable.

Over 150 years ago, scientists of the time came up with "germ theory", which most medical personnel still believe to this day. When they performed an autopsy on someone who died of some disease, they found the body was infested with debris they determined to be a "virus". In fact, that debris was nothing more than dead cells breaking down.

If that is true, WHAT caused the deaths - the epidemic? Well, it could be a number of things, but what it is not is a virus (which explains why Covid-19 has NEVER been isolated having come from someone who contracted it).

EVERY disease is caused by one of the following:

Bacteria
Fungi
Protozoa
Algae
Heavy metals
Parasite
Environmental (pollution etc.)

One example, as in the case of the Black Death in the 1300's, would be - RATS! Here is what likely happened:

In the 13th century the "Little Ice Age" began, affecting the weather in the northern hemisphere. It lasted until the middle of the 19th century. But by the 14th century (the time of the Black Death) the weather had caused a severe famine throughout Europe and places north. It was so bad that the farmers of Greenland were forced to become seafaring raiders - the Vikings. The food shortage not only affected the people, but also animals - including rats. In search of food, rats started invading homes. They left their excrement everywhere - especially in any stores of grain. People would consume the grain, and in doing so would ingest the pathogens (bacteria, NOT viruses) in the excrement, which killed the cells in the body. To this day, rats are responsible for plague such as bubonic plague that recently hit Arizona. See https://extension.arizona.edu/sites/extension.arizona.edu/files/pubs/az1784-2018.pdf

Bear in mind, all "viruses" are nothing more than decaying dead cells that have been killed by bacteria or other parasitic organism the people contract from outside sources, like bad water, bad food, polluted air. This is why anti-parasitics like Ivermectin and HCQ work. We are bombarded by pathogens constantly. Under normal conditions, the body's immune system can handle any such "infections". But for the last 150 years, vaccines have suppressed our immune systems to the point where they simply cannot handle the load.

In the case of the Covid vaccines, the "vaccines" themselves are attacking and killing cells, and introducing more "parasites", perhaps in the form of graphene oxide. This explains all the "variants" that seem to emanate from vaccinated people (shedding), and why most new cases are among the vaccinated.

To protect yourself from a "viral" infection, all that is required is a healthy diet, regular exercise, extra vitamin C and D3 and avoid fluoridated water or foods grown inorganically - and avoid vaccines like the plague - because they ARE the plague!

Here then is just one of the many videos where experts show the truth behind "viruses".

https://www.bitchute.com/video/EdffVJbFxb96/

 

/

The Science Behind Masks - Facts vs Fiction

by Bill Vaughn

With the advent of the SARS CoV2 virus (Covid-19) there has been a virtual battle going on concerning the effectiveness of wearing surgical masks or cloth face coverings. And it seems that all sides in this issue have dug in, citing conflicting reports. I say "reports" because most of what is being put forth as "the science" simply is not the science at all. Both sides are relying on agenda-driven assumptions, conjecture, and in some instances, outright falsehoods. To muddy the waters even further, every study that has been done over the years, and published in the most venerable medical periodicals have suddenly been erased, and replaced with the opposite narrative. I will get into the reason(s) behind this later in this post. 

Here are several samples of the studies that the medical establishment have relied upon for years - note that these studies were carried out carefully and established as "the science:

                                                                 (click to enlarge)

As you can see, all the tests, data and science points to surgical masks not being effective against a virus. Anything less than a surgical mask is even worse. The primary (but not the only) reason is simple math:

One needs an electron microscope to see a COVID 19 virus particle. Average COVID 19 virus particle size… is 0.125 microns… The hoarded N 95 mask - the best mask available - only filters down to 0.3 microns. So, N95 masks block few, if any, virus particles. This is a simple fact, so you just cannot argue against it. ~Doc Graham, MD

There are other reasons why masks are ineffective, but even more important is that masks can actually spread virus. A mask is really just:

• recirculating your own germs
• lowering your oxygen level 
• certainly negatively impacting your immune system 
• providing a false sense of security so you do not social distance as much
• touching your mask to move it will spread the virus
• the moist environment between face and mask is a breeding ground for other toxins
  
• not wearing it correctly will spread the virus
• reusing a mask - even if laundered - can spread the virus
• taking it off and putting it down can contaminate whatever you placed it on
  

Question: how can breathing in your own germs all the time be ‘safe? If you have the virus, re-breathing it in will make you more ill. And if you do not have the virus, you do not need a mask to keep "other" people safe. In either case, a mask is virtually useless from a medical standpoint.

And then there is this: up to 34 million Americans have some form of chronic respiratory pulmonary condition such as emphysema, chronic bronchitis, asthma and lung cancer, to name a few. Even the CDC warns against those people wearing masks, as it can contribute to serious damage to an already compromised system. I know that first-hand: I have COPD and already having trouble getting enough oxygen, and if I wear a mask more than a few minutes I can pass out, resulting in a fall that could be fatal (I am 73). A representative from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) told Reuters: “The CO2 will slowly build up in the mask over time. However, the level of CO2 likely to build up in the mask is mostly tolerable to people exposed to it. The exception, however, are those with chronic pulmonary issues. Such people are advised to not wear masks."

When Covid-19 first appeared, the medical establishment, from the World Health Organization, to the CDC, to the "experts" like Dr. Anthony Fauci all told us emphatically NOT to wear masks because they do nothing to protect us; that they were only useful in operating rooms. That was (and still is) true. But even in a hospital setting, where the best, fitted N95 masks are used, they still do not fully protect from any virus - that was never the purpose of masks. They are used to protect doctors from other pathogens such as bacteria, and to keep spittle from falling on the patient, and keep blood spatter from getting in the surgeon's mouth and eyes.  All such particles are considerably larger than a virus and will not to get through the mask (N95 means 95% effective against particles .3 microns or larger - a virus is only .125 microns).

Meanwhile, those experts began erasing all the studies cited above, replacing those studies with a completely opposite narrative - one that was not even determined by actual studies, but rather created to further a different agenda, which is described later in this article.

The new narrative coming from the "experts" was a complete reversal of their previous stance. Now they were telling us that masks do work against a virus, and encouraged us to wear them, playing on our "humanity" by claiming, "they are not for protecting you - it's to protect others from you to stop the spread" while also taking advantage of our ignorance. 

Think about that for a moment...if YOUR mask keeps virus from getting out to the other guy, how does your mask NOT keep out his virus coming at you? If your mask does not protect you, then it doesn't protect him from you, either. That is the Big Lie behind the push for masks. So, what does the SCIENCE have to say? At the end of this article you will find a link to many actual medical studies - the science - from around the world that makes it clear that masks do not work, and may even contribute to the spread.

So now it behooves us to try and understand why so many "experts", medical organizations and politicians are intent on forcing mask mandates on the public. And while many people reading this may think it to be a conspiracy theory, it is critical that you understand that while it is a conspiracy, it is anything but theory. The following are facts that you can research independently if you wish. But first a side note: according to actual figures provided by the CDC and elsewhere, up to 70% of "cases" are false positives.  Of all deaths attributed to Covid, only about 6% were actually caused BY the virus - roughly only 20,000 of the reported 330,000. Furthermore, total number of deaths from all causes in 2020 are no different from previous years - there are no "extra" 330,000 deaths:

For centuries there has been a cabal of extremely powerful and wealthy families - some are Royals, most are bankers, and they consider themselves superior to the masses. Envision if you will the feudal system of Merry Olde England, where Lords in their mansions oversaw estates populated by serfs. The serfs were nothing more than chattel - livestock, whose purpose in life was to serve the Masters in the mansion. This is how elites see the separation between themselves and us. I am sure you notice how elites tell us to stop wasting fuel while they jet around the globe, and how they are not obligated to follow the lockdowns or masks they force on us. Surely you have noticed! Rules for thee but not for me.

Get the picture? In days of old, many of the elite were referred to as the Illuminati. In the 20th Century they were involved with the Trilateral Commission and the Bilderburg conference. Today they are called "globalists", with the intent of establishing a New World Order - the "Great Reset" that the United Nations speaks of in their Agenda21, Agenda30 and Vision50 

This is going to sound unbelievable, but you had better believe this...

Make no mistake - their singular agenda is world domination, where they rule, and we serve them as serfs. But it is worse than that - they believe eugenics is a requirement, to rid the Earth of those they deem "unfit", like the elderly and infirm and other undesirables. Such people use up precious resources that are becoming increasingly scarce. Any person unable to produce more than he or she uses will be exterminated. Do not take my word for it - do your research, as others have done. Globalists make no secret of their agenda. For example, Dr. Henry Kissinger stated, "Depopulation should be the highest priority", and John D Rockefeller, a Bilderburg member stated, "We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order". And even Bill Gates, our new "vaccine king" stated in a video in 2010, "The world has 6.8 billion people...that's headed up to 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care (infertility drugs in vaccines, like he used in Kenya and India), reproductive health services (abortion), we could lower that by perhaps 10-15%."

So what does that have to do with masks? They understand the truth in the words of Joseph Goebbels - instill enough fear in people and you can get them to do anything. It is really incredibly simple: by creating "the right major crisis" (a pandemic) they scare you into getting you to accept masks, social distancing and lockdowns, which are necessary to weaken our will, our independence. They get us to give up our Constitutional Rights without a shot fired. Those Rights keep them from ushering in their New World Order. And it helps them close churches - religion also gets in their way. Bars and restaurants are closed because that is where people gather and revolutions have been known to start. And by closing the small businesses, the masses are required to buy whatever they need from businesses owned by the elites, like Amazon and WalMart. They are siphoning off all the wealth. Since this pandemic began, the wealthiest people have amassed more wealth than they have in the last decade.

If you think all this sounds far-fetched, read up on those United Nations agendas mentioned earlier. And understand why hydroxychloroquine was banned to fight Covid - if there is a cheap therapeutic, then the tracking vaccines would not be needed nor accepted. And they NEED everyone to get that vaccine. It is the entire reason that contact tracing became a thing (your government has already approved a billion dollars for it), complete with apps on your phone (go ahead - look in your settings). California is already using the app to track people. Imagine trying to fight off the globalists when they can use the tracking in the vaccine to prevent you from entering stores to buy food, prevent you from buying guns or ammo. And those who refuse the vaccine? If the tracing chemical or nanobot is not in your system, the alarm goes off when you try to enter any place of business, much as they do now when you attempt to leave with stolen items.

It does not get any more real than this, folks. And it is already upon us. If the people do not wake up to what is really going on, it will soon be too late to stop it.

First it is masks. Then the vaccine. Then it's all over.

Here are studies from around the world that state masks have no value in protecting people from a virus. There are others...

https://real-estate-man.livejournal.com/5289.html

 

 

 

 

 

How To Prevent The Next "Crisis"

This article is not going to claim that it is possible to prevent another pandemic. That is not likely possible. But what IS possible is to be prepared in such a way that the next crisis need not be such a devastating problem. And it is so easy to do. And frankly, it's common sense, so our politicians may need a little help from We, the People to show them they way, for as we are now seeing, most of our elected officials are seriously lacking in the critical thinking that is the basis of common sense - or vice versa.

First, critical thinking would lead us to find the most logical root of the issue, and from there would necessitate taking orderly steps toward what you want for an end result. In this case, the root of the problem is simply that our state officials and local medical facilities do not properly prepare for a catastrophe. Hospital administrators are quick to take huge salaries plus nice bonuses instead of having their facilities keep an adequate supply of essential items in the quantity required for a pandemic. State officials, who are politicians and not usually good planners, do not pass legislation requiring that medical facilities properly prepare to treat patients in even the worst of circumstances.

Imagine if every medical facility had had an abundance of N95 masks, nitrile gloves, and ventilators on hand in case of emergency. Where would we be today? I doubt the country would be shut down and the economy crashing around our ears. And I seriously doubt as many lives would have been lost.

Now, this blogger is not the sort to rant about a problem unless he has a possible solution in mind...

As a reader of the Good Book I recall that a Pharoah once had a dream about fat cows and lean cows. When he asked Joseph to interpret the dream, Joe told him it meant there would be seven years of plenty followed by seven years of famine. The Pharoah then decreed that 1/7 of all crops would be stored for the future, for seven years. When the years of famine came, the Pharoah's people had plenty to eat. See where I'm going here?

I suggest, first and foremost, that the citizens of each state contact their legislative body and tell them they need to do something similar to this plan, and do it quickly. Keep on them until they DO it. Because if YOU do not get on them, nothing will change, and the next time something like this happens, it may be you, or your family and friends that will suffer for it. That is the first and most important step - I hope you will all step up to the plate by passing this on to everyone you know, and contacting your leaders - as often as necessary until it ges done.

I realize I may be stretching this a bit, and giving too much credit to our illustrious leaders, but I must assume they are at least as smart as a 4000 year old dead Egyptian.

Step two - create The Plan. One suggestion (and a good one, if I say so myself) is for each state to set up one or more centrally located warehouses and get them stocked to the level required. The state would charge every medical facility in the state a pre-determined percentage of their monthly or quarterly profits and use those funds EXCLUSIVELY to stock those warehouses. The amount charged should be sufficient to be have them fully stocked within 3 years.

After it is fully stocked, medical facilities would obtain their "normal" supplies from the warehouse as needed. What they use would be replaced by their quarterly payments for stocking, thereby keeping a full stockpile at all times. Someone wold be appointed by THE PEOPLE, in a vote, to oversee that the stock remains full. Checks and balances, y'know. It just would not do to allow "rats" to get in and "eat up" those supplies, if you get my drift!

Step three - IMPLEMENT the Plan! One way or another, FORCE your elected officials to do their job, which, to put it bluntly is to provide for the HEALTH AND SAFETY of the citizens of their state.

Well? Do you need an invitation? Pass this on to everyone in your circle, then contact your elected officials and DEMAND they implement a similar plan. It's your state.  And it just might mean the lives of those you love (not to mention yourself).

We now know what is important. This is it!

/